Systematic Review of FGF-23 in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Comparison with Other Biomarkers

Authors

  • M.A. Jimoh Department of Prosthetics and orthotics, Federal University of Health Sciences, Ila-Orangun, Nigeria Author
  • A.A. Ishola Department of Audiology, Federal University of Health Sciences, Ila-Orangun, Nigeria. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18071726

Keywords:

FGF-23, prostate cancer, biomarkers, diagnostic performance, specificity, sensitivity

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer represents a major health burden in sub-Saharan Africa, where patients often present with aggressive disease and rising incidence rates. This review evaluates the diagnostic and prognostic performance of Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 (FGF-23) relative to the clinical standards, Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) and Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), to determine its utility in enhancing diagnostic precision.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted across studies published between 2010 and 2025. The analysis focused on the sensitivity, specificity, and Area Under the Curve (AUC) of FGF-23, PSA, and AMACR, with a specific emphasis on data from African cohorts and skeletal-related outcomes.

Results: FGF-23 demonstrated a diagnostic sensitivity of approximately 66.7% and a superior specificity of 83.3% in differentiating prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). While PSA maintained a higher overall sensitivity (85.0% to 90.0%), its specificity was significantly lower (25.0% to 45.0%), leading to high false-positive rates in the gray zone (4 to 10 ng/mL). AMACR showed high specificity in tissue-based studies (90.0% to 95.0%) but lower utility in serum screening. Diagnostic accuracy for FGF-23 ranged from an AUC of 0.69 to 0.75, consistently outperforming PSA in the gray zone. Furthermore, FGF-23 was identified as a high-value prognostic marker for bone metastasis and skeletal-related events, correlating strongly with tumor invasiveness and poor survival.

Conclusion: FGF-23 serves as a potent adjunct biomarker that addresses the specificity limitations of PSA testing. Its dual role as a diagnostic filter for BPH and a prognostic indicator for metastatic spread makes it particularly relevant for African populations. Further large-scale prospective validation is recommended to standardize FGF-23 integration into multi-marker diagnostic protocols.

Published

05-01-2026

How to Cite

Systematic Review of FGF-23 in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Comparison with Other Biomarkers. (2026). African Journal of Allied Health Sciences (AJAHS), 2(1), 42 – 54. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18071726