Utilization of speech-language pathology services among parents of children with speech and language disorders in Ibadan, Nigeria.

Authors

  • IA Salako Department of Audiology, Federal University of Health Sciences Ila-orangun, Nigeria , Institute of Child Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan Author
  • S Ogunronbi Audiology and Speech Language Pathology Unit, Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, Federal Medical Centre, Author
  • ID Ajayi Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA Author
  • BB Vangerwua Department of Audiology, Federal University of Health Sciences Ila-orangun, Nigeria Author
  • OA Oluokun Department of Audiology, Federal University of Health Sciences, Ila-Orangun, Nigeria. Author

Keywords:

Speech-Language Pathology, Service Utilization, Healthcare Barriers, Socio-cultural Factors, Speech-Language Disorders, Children

Abstract

Background: Pediatric speech-language disorders present a global health challenge, yet service utilization remains suboptimal in developing contexts. This study investigated the determinants of Speech-Language Pathology (SLP) service utilization among parents in Ibadan, Nigeria, specifically examining the interplay between healthcare system barriers and socio-cultural factors.

Methods: Using a quantitative, cross-sectional design derived from a larger sequential exploratory mixed-methods study, 211 parents were recruited via multi-stage sampling from 10 urban and rural schools. Data were collected through an interviewer-administered questionnaire (Cronbach's α = .81) developed from preliminary qualitative themes. Binary logistic regression was employed to identify sociodemographic predictors of service utilization and perceived barriers.

Results: Only 37.4% (n = 79) of parents had utilized SLP services. Logistic regression identified post-secondary education (OR = 3.16, p = .001) and urban residence (OR = 2.56, p = .003) as the strongest predictors of service use. Financial constraints (90.0%) and accessibility issues (85.7%) were the most prevalent systemic barriers; rural residents were significantly more likely to report financial hurdles (OR = 3.06, p = .004) and long hospital wait times (OR = 2.18, p = .018). Socio-cultural barriers were prominent, with 77.7% of parents citing ignorance and 60.1% reporting psychological denial. While ignorance was linked to rurality (p = .005), parental denial was significantly higher among urban residents (OR = 1.99, p = .033). Gender did not significantly predict utilization or barrier perception (p > .05).

Conclusion: Service utilization is driven by educational awareness and geographical proximity, but hindered by a complex paradox: rural parents face structural and financial exclusion, while urban parents are deterred by psychological denial. Interventions must move beyond infrastructure to include targeted public health campaigns that address diagnostic denial and improve community-level awareness.

Keywords: Speech-Language Pathology, Service Utilization, Healthcare Barriers, Socio-cultural Factors, Speech-Language Disorders, Children

References

1. Norbury CF, Gooch D, Wray C, Baird G, Charman T, Simonoff E, et al. The impact of nonverbal ability on prevalence and clinical presentation of language disorder: evidence from a population study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016;57(11):1247-1257. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12573.

2. Tomblin JB, Records NL, Buckwalter P, Zhang X, Smith E, O’Brien M. Prevalence of specific language impairment in kindergarten children. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997;40(6):1245-1260. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4006.1245.

3. Olusanya BO, Newton VE. Global burden of childhood hearing impairment and disability: a systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;71(6):861-878. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.02.019.

4. Khamis S, Mwaniki M, Mwaura H. Prevalence of communication disorders in children aged 0-6 years in a Kenyan population. Afr J Disabil. 2021;10(1):583. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v10i1.583.

5. Lyons R, Roulstone S. Well-being and resilience in children with speech and language disorders. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018;61(2):324-344. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0391.

6. Conti-Ramsden G, Durkin K. Language disorder and its impact on psychosocial outcomes. Curr Dev Disord Rep. 2016;3(3):179-185. doi: 10.1007/s40474-016-0086-4.

7. Broomfield J, Dodd B. Is speech and language therapy effective for children with primary speech and language impairment? Report of a randomized control trial. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011;46(6):628-640. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00039.x.

8. Law J, Dennis JA, Charlton JJV. Speech and language therapy interventions for children with primary speech and/or language disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(1):CD012490. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012490.

9. Wylie K, McAllister L, Davidson B, Marshall J. Communication rehabilitation in sub-Saharan Africa: A workforce profile of speech and language therapists. Afr J Disabil. 2016;5(1):227. doi: 10.4102/ajod.v5i1.227.

10. Dussault G, Franceschini MC. Not enough there, too many here: understanding geographical imbalances in the distribution of the health workforce. Hum Resour Health. 2006;4:12. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-4-12.

11. World Health Organization. Community-based rehabilitation: CBR guidelines. Geneva: WHO; 2010.

12. Aregbeshola BS, Khan SM. Out-of-pocket payments, catastrophic health expenditure, and poverty among households in Nigeria 2010. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7(9):798-806. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2018.19.

13. Douthit N, Kiv S, Dwolatzky T, Biswas S. Exposing some important barriers to health care access in the rural USA. Public Health. 2015;129(6):611-620. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.04.001.

14. Fusco S, Voci D, Arnaudo S, Behr L, Chappuis M, Checchi F, et al. Impact of waiting times on children's health: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2022;17(5):e0267548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267548.

15. Hartley S, Ojwang' P, Baguwemu A, Ddamulira M, Chavuta A. How do carers of disabled children cope? The Ugandan perspective. Child Care Health Dev. 2005;31(3):311-322. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2005.00509.x.

16. Mallow M, Theodoros D, Lincoln M. A global perspective on service delivery in speech-language pathology. In: Theodoros D, editor. Telepractice in speech-language pathology. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2012. p. 1-28.

17. Ruggero L, McCabe P, Ballard KJ, Munro N. Paediatric speech-language pathology service delivery: An exploratory survey of Australian parents. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012;14(4):338-350. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2011.650213.

18. Speech-Language & Audiology Canada. Canadian guidelines for speech-language pathology service delivery. 2021.

19. Lee AA, Piette JD, Heisler M, Janevic MR, Langa KM, Rosland AM. Family members' experiences supporting adults with chronic illness: A national survey. Fam Syst Health. 2017;35(4):463-473. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000293.

20. Ndung’u R, Kinyua M. Cultural perspectives in language and speech disorders. Disabil Stud Q. 2009;29(4). doi: 10.18061/dsq.v29i4.986.

21. McGregor KK. How we fail children with developmental language disorder. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2020;51(4):981-992. doi: 10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00003.

22. Federal Ministry of Health, Nigeria. National Policy on Ear and Hearing Care. Abuja: FMOH; 2019.

Published

2026-07-30

How to Cite

Utilization of speech-language pathology services among parents of children with speech and language disorders in Ibadan, Nigeria. (2026). African Journal of Allied Health Sciences (AJAHS), 3(1). https://ajahs.fuhsi.edu.ng/index.php/home/article/view/10